<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soaring cost of nuclear weapons to be $180 billion or more over next decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/</link>
	<description>Grassroots action for a safer, more just world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: $7.6 billion buys a lot of Valentine candy &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[$7.6 billion buys a lot of Valentine candy &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1624#comment-3174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2010, the administration announced a 10-year plan to increase nuclear weapons spending, and according to that plan they were going to request $7.9 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010, the administration announced a 10-year plan to increase nuclear weapons spending, and according to that plan they were going to request $7.9 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Do it&#34;: Lugar urges Senate START vote now - Page 4 - Politics &#38; Current Affairs Forum</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#34;Do it&#34;: Lugar urges Senate START vote now - Page 4 - Politics &#38; Current Affairs Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1624#comment-1821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] America safe&quot; and the outrage would be all up and around FoxPac and talk hate radio.  Soaring cost of nuclear weapons to be $180 billion or more over next decade  May 28, 2010  tags: CMRR, Kansas City Plant, New START, Nuclear Weapons, nuclear weapons funding, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] America safe&quot; and the outrage would be all up and around FoxPac and talk hate radio.  Soaring cost of nuclear weapons to be $180 billion or more over next decade  May 28, 2010  tags: CMRR, Kansas City Plant, New START, Nuclear Weapons, nuclear weapons funding, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New START delay &#8211; time to secure Senate Republican votes &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New START delay &#8211; time to secure Senate Republican votes &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1624#comment-1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mid-September. The delay has a lot to do with partisan obstructionism and Republican demands for even more money for nuclear modernization. Kerry has just 6 weeks to secure enough Republican votes to pass New [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mid-September. The delay has a lot to do with partisan obstructionism and Republican demands for even more money for nuclear modernization. Kerry has just 6 weeks to secure enough Republican votes to pass New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update: Ratifying New START Nuclear Treaty &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update: Ratifying New START Nuclear Treaty &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1624#comment-1369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up the already bloated nuclear weapons complex. The Obama administration has offered a whopping $180 billion 10-year increase to funding for nuclear weapons, and it&#8217;s unclear exactly how that funding would be used. So [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up the already bloated nuclear weapons complex. The Obama administration has offered a whopping $180 billion 10-year increase to funding for nuclear weapons, and it&#8217;s unclear exactly how that funding would be used. So [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kara j lincoln</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2010/05/28/soaring-cost-of-nuclear-weapons-to-be-180-billion-or-more-over-next-decade/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kara j lincoln]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1624#comment-1364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi folks, 

this was my responce to congress, thanks again to PAW keeping me posted of such outrageopus thought.

I feel we can make this a platform to better understand the threads of them over riding our thought as well our actions we can take to stop this madness, with PAW&#039;s help for a timeline of what is veing voted on. when we don&#039;t know how to ask the right questions, etc in real time.

but for now if we all come together + contact these folks, PAW is right, together we can make a difference ASAP..

                  to Oregon senators, etc:
                          As a constituent, I oppose increasing spending on nuclear weapons programs that won&#039;t make us safer. In today&#039;s world, the existence of nuclear weapons increases the risk of an accidental launch or terrorists acquiring nuclear weapons. Rather than spend the proposed $180 billion over the next decade to build up our nuclear weapons infrastructure and upgrade our nuclear weapons stockpile, we should invest in programs to secure and dismantle nuclear weapons, making all of us safer.

The $225 million Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement facility in New Mexico will enable the U.S. to produce more plutonium pits, the bomb cores of nuclear weapons, in the future and build up our nuclear arsenal. I support cutting funding for more plutonium pit production.

I also urge you to oppose the $252 million in funding for a study in 2011 to upgrade the B61 nuclear bomb, which is deployed in Europe, when numerous European nations are pressing for its removal in the near future. Keeping U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe is unsafe and contributes to the risk of theft by terrorists.

please tell me whom supports this mental mode of spending + what channels are taken for these funds to be allocated for this subject matter.

please tell me why you think you have the right to make these decisions without the support of the american people. for our movement will work to stop all threads. rather can&#039;t you see how american local folks need support to self-develop. for our wild to remain wild for our ecological sustainability. our peace. this fuels us to share what works locally + afar within human potential with peaceful communication.  all the studies colleges teach around the world, which would be very hypocritcal of yous that vote for this measure, for it is a war economy of the past from dysfunctional minds that need to have support to rethink + realize they are inner personally dysfunctional.

we whom have energy alternatives for peaceful negotiations want to support you folks that believe in this wasteful funding, as well aggressive old mind sets of the past.. so they may see solutions we have now, locally + beyound to unite with our international communitys for progressive communications. if you cannot see to this transition then you need to step down + allow sharp minds to lead this country.

yes young + old that work together to sustain colledge curriculum that has meaning to co_evolve with our evolving human species. not study, go in dept then fins that people with money have bought policy, bought rights to do injustice. local sustainable policy needs our attention know to rewrite what is real + rid what has been manipulated + bought from those gaining from the war economy.

 international communications for networking is alive + this movement will support you to see that this is senile + retrogressive in human thought to use such valuable resources for such foolishness. vs support all to become self-reliant + aware of inner-intrapersonal development, all humans are capable of..

please do all you can to support those that have been overpowered from the war economy mode internationally + allow them to heal from the negative effects the US has left.

we can have better platforms to discuss openly creative, energy efficient avenues for this dialog so the american people can stop such foolishness + redirect this energy/funding for local sustainable living now.

 that which fuels us as the human race to part time collectively network so all humans can do the same + prioritize those that are unable + suffering.

which have been left without support if you scan local + beyond for these deficiency&#039;s which have been ignored from the US + the UN, along with many other so called developed countries.

this is very wrong + we need to prioritize + realize we have the ability to maintain self-sensory observation vs belief, + those whom get supported/healed, unaware, have the human right to become an equal in understanding this thought. not attacked due to their misunderstanding.

this is what democracy is about. people making decisions, not business, not governments alone.


peace is an option know if we share what works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks, </p>
<p>this was my responce to congress, thanks again to PAW keeping me posted of such outrageopus thought.</p>
<p>I feel we can make this a platform to better understand the threads of them over riding our thought as well our actions we can take to stop this madness, with PAW&#8217;s help for a timeline of what is veing voted on. when we don&#8217;t know how to ask the right questions, etc in real time.</p>
<p>but for now if we all come together + contact these folks, PAW is right, together we can make a difference ASAP..</p>
<p>                  to Oregon senators, etc:<br />
                          As a constituent, I oppose increasing spending on nuclear weapons programs that won&#8217;t make us safer. In today&#8217;s world, the existence of nuclear weapons increases the risk of an accidental launch or terrorists acquiring nuclear weapons. Rather than spend the proposed $180 billion over the next decade to build up our nuclear weapons infrastructure and upgrade our nuclear weapons stockpile, we should invest in programs to secure and dismantle nuclear weapons, making all of us safer.</p>
<p>The $225 million Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement facility in New Mexico will enable the U.S. to produce more plutonium pits, the bomb cores of nuclear weapons, in the future and build up our nuclear arsenal. I support cutting funding for more plutonium pit production.</p>
<p>I also urge you to oppose the $252 million in funding for a study in 2011 to upgrade the B61 nuclear bomb, which is deployed in Europe, when numerous European nations are pressing for its removal in the near future. Keeping U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe is unsafe and contributes to the risk of theft by terrorists.</p>
<p>please tell me whom supports this mental mode of spending + what channels are taken for these funds to be allocated for this subject matter.</p>
<p>please tell me why you think you have the right to make these decisions without the support of the american people. for our movement will work to stop all threads. rather can&#8217;t you see how american local folks need support to self-develop. for our wild to remain wild for our ecological sustainability. our peace. this fuels us to share what works locally + afar within human potential with peaceful communication.  all the studies colleges teach around the world, which would be very hypocritcal of yous that vote for this measure, for it is a war economy of the past from dysfunctional minds that need to have support to rethink + realize they are inner personally dysfunctional.</p>
<p>we whom have energy alternatives for peaceful negotiations want to support you folks that believe in this wasteful funding, as well aggressive old mind sets of the past.. so they may see solutions we have now, locally + beyound to unite with our international communitys for progressive communications. if you cannot see to this transition then you need to step down + allow sharp minds to lead this country.</p>
<p>yes young + old that work together to sustain colledge curriculum that has meaning to co_evolve with our evolving human species. not study, go in dept then fins that people with money have bought policy, bought rights to do injustice. local sustainable policy needs our attention know to rewrite what is real + rid what has been manipulated + bought from those gaining from the war economy.</p>
<p> international communications for networking is alive + this movement will support you to see that this is senile + retrogressive in human thought to use such valuable resources for such foolishness. vs support all to become self-reliant + aware of inner-intrapersonal development, all humans are capable of..</p>
<p>please do all you can to support those that have been overpowered from the war economy mode internationally + allow them to heal from the negative effects the US has left.</p>
<p>we can have better platforms to discuss openly creative, energy efficient avenues for this dialog so the american people can stop such foolishness + redirect this energy/funding for local sustainable living now.</p>
<p> that which fuels us as the human race to part time collectively network so all humans can do the same + prioritize those that are unable + suffering.</p>
<p>which have been left without support if you scan local + beyond for these deficiency&#8217;s which have been ignored from the US + the UN, along with many other so called developed countries.</p>
<p>this is very wrong + we need to prioritize + realize we have the ability to maintain self-sensory observation vs belief, + those whom get supported/healed, unaware, have the human right to become an equal in understanding this thought. not attacked due to their misunderstanding.</p>
<p>this is what democracy is about. people making decisions, not business, not governments alone.</p>
<p>peace is an option know if we share what works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

