<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressional progressives urge Obama to change Afghanistan strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2009/11/20/congressional-progressives-urge-obama-to-change-afghanistan-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2009/11/20/congressional-progressives-urge-obama-to-change-afghanistan-strategy/</link>
	<description>Grassroots action for a safer, more just world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley St.Claire</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2009/11/20/congressional-progressives-urge-obama-to-change-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley St.Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1118#comment-976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Surge”

December 6, 2009 by politicalsnapshots.wordpress.com

“The Surge”

The war in Afghanistan is also a continuation and expansion of the corporate welfare policy of the Bush administration, which interestingly is not only wholly accepted by President Obama, but is raised to a higher level (surge). The more private contractors sent to Afghanistan, the better for the bottom line (surge) (profit). The more the merrier. Bush or Obama, as always, the interest of the corporate elite is paramount.

The decrease in violence in Iraq was not a result of President Bush’s strategy of sending 30,000 more troops to Iraq (surge), that President Obama is so desperately trying to duplicate, but it was mainly a result of the U.S. government’s payment of about $10 a day to about 70,000 Sunni insurgents.

During his speech to the nation explaining his reasons for the Afghanistan “surge”, the president said:

“So, no, I do not make this decision lightly.  I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  This is the epicenter of violent extremism practiced by al Qaeda.  It is from here that we were attacked on 9/11, and it is from here that new attacks are being plotted as I speak. …   In the last few months alone, we have apprehended extremists within our borders who were sent here from the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan to commit new acts of terror. And this danger will only grow if the region slides backwards, and al Qaeda can operate with impunity.  We must keep the pressure on al Qaeda, and to do that, we must increase the stability and capacity of our partners in the region.”

I thought I was listening to President Bush. Word for word the same message, but, a different messenger, one who is more articulate. He also used Bush’s tactic of scaring the American public, the danger to America “is no idle danger, no hypothetical threat”. The only thing missing from his speech was that, he didn’t use the threat level colors. It is too early in his presidency; we might still see him use the threat levels in the future.

The president’s troop” surge” in the Afghanistan war has made his Conservative Republican friends temporarily happy, but members of his own political party and the American citizens at large are not supportive of his so-called “surge”. While America is facing a massive unemployment, millions of citizens without health insurance, the country burdened with cumbersome and chocking growing debt, to say the least, the president’s choice of the Afghanistan “surge” at this particular moment, seems to be unwise.

Professor Mekonen Haddis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The Surge”</p>
<p>December 6, 2009 by politicalsnapshots.wordpress.com</p>
<p>“The Surge”</p>
<p>The war in Afghanistan is also a continuation and expansion of the corporate welfare policy of the Bush administration, which interestingly is not only wholly accepted by President Obama, but is raised to a higher level (surge). The more private contractors sent to Afghanistan, the better for the bottom line (surge) (profit). The more the merrier. Bush or Obama, as always, the interest of the corporate elite is paramount.</p>
<p>The decrease in violence in Iraq was not a result of President Bush’s strategy of sending 30,000 more troops to Iraq (surge), that President Obama is so desperately trying to duplicate, but it was mainly a result of the U.S. government’s payment of about $10 a day to about 70,000 Sunni insurgents.</p>
<p>During his speech to the nation explaining his reasons for the Afghanistan “surge”, the president said:</p>
<p>“So, no, I do not make this decision lightly.  I make this decision because I am convinced that our security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  This is the epicenter of violent extremism practiced by al Qaeda.  It is from here that we were attacked on 9/11, and it is from here that new attacks are being plotted as I speak. …   In the last few months alone, we have apprehended extremists within our borders who were sent here from the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan to commit new acts of terror. And this danger will only grow if the region slides backwards, and al Qaeda can operate with impunity.  We must keep the pressure on al Qaeda, and to do that, we must increase the stability and capacity of our partners in the region.”</p>
<p>I thought I was listening to President Bush. Word for word the same message, but, a different messenger, one who is more articulate. He also used Bush’s tactic of scaring the American public, the danger to America “is no idle danger, no hypothetical threat”. The only thing missing from his speech was that, he didn’t use the threat level colors. It is too early in his presidency; we might still see him use the threat levels in the future.</p>
<p>The president’s troop” surge” in the Afghanistan war has made his Conservative Republican friends temporarily happy, but members of his own political party and the American citizens at large are not supportive of his so-called “surge”. While America is facing a massive unemployment, millions of citizens without health insurance, the country burdened with cumbersome and chocking growing debt, to say the least, the president’s choice of the Afghanistan “surge” at this particular moment, seems to be unwise.</p>
<p>Professor Mekonen Haddis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama&#8217;s escalation in Afghanistan: unrealistic and costly &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2009/11/20/congressional-progressives-urge-obama-to-change-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[President Obama&#8217;s escalation in Afghanistan: unrealistic and costly &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1118#comment-943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on a realistic assessment on the ground and a more efficient investment of our tax dollars. The Congressional Progressive Caucus outlined elements of a new plan in their recent letter to Obama. In our policy agenda Strategic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a realistic assessment on the ground and a more efficient investment of our tax dollars. The Congressional Progressive Caucus outlined elements of a new plan in their recent letter to Obama. In our policy agenda Strategic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: National call-in day: tell Obama no more troops &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West</title>
		<link>http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/2009/11/20/congressional-progressives-urge-obama-to-change-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[National call-in day: tell Obama no more troops &#171; Groundswell Blog, from Peace Action West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.peaceactionwest.org/?p=1118#comment-932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to discuss a new approach in Afghanistan. Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus just sent President Obama a letter asking for a meeting and calling for a “comprehensive rethinking” of Afghanistan strategy. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to discuss a new approach in Afghanistan. Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus just sent President Obama a letter asking for a meeting and calling for a “comprehensive rethinking” of Afghanistan strategy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

